Thursday 11 November 2021

Flotation '21: Day 4 update

Thursday 11th November

Circuits and plant practice was the theme of today's presentations, which got off to a fine start with a keynote lecture from Associate Professor Kym Runge, Group Leader of the SMI-JKMRC, University Of Queensland, Australia. Kym showed how an important role of a site metallurgist is to diagnose reasons for problems in a flotation circuit and devise strategies to overcome these problems. 

Traditionally this has involved performing and analysing information from a flotation circuit survey. It is difficult to determine from this information alone definitive flotation mineral recovery mechanisms and strategies for circuit improvement. There are, however, new analytical and modelling techniques that can be used to complement traditional survey data. These techniques are able to determine the effect of mineralogy, surface chemistry and circuit design on flotation circuit recoveries and grades. They can suggest strategies for improvement which would not have been identified via a conventional circuit audit. Kym reviewed these new approaches and used an industrial example to demonstrate the type of conclusions that can be derived. 

There were 20 presentations in another long day (see programme and abstracts), seven of these by conference sponsors. The first was by Glencore Technology's Glenn Steiper, who highlighted the imperative to reduce concentrator CapEx and Opex while maintaining throughput and metallurgy. He believes that the launching of the Jameson Concentrator is a step in the right direction to address these challenges as it treats the required tonnes, but offers many significant environmental and economic advantages.

Glencore Technology celebrating the 30th Anniversary of the Jameson Cell
with Graeme Jameson at Flotation '19
Livia Faustino represented Vale Institute of Technology, Brazil at Flotation '19, but now she is Project Manager with sponsor Clariant, Brazil, and this morning described the reverse cationic flotation of silicates by adding ultrafine iron ore tailings to the conventional flotation feed.

Zeiss Microscopy is a sponsor of many MEI Conferences. Eddy Hill joined Zeiss in 2012 with a remit to develop automated analytical solutions for geoscientists and the mining Industry. He attended Process Mineralogy '12 and Process Mineralogy '14, but this was his first flotation event and in his presentation he discussed 3D Mineralogy–X-ray microscopy automated mineralogy for a flotation circuit, which was introduced only last week).

Earlier in the year we welcomed Metso Outotec as a sponsor of Sustainable Minerals '21, and although this will be the first time that the company has had the opportunity to sponsor a flotation conference since the merger of Metso and Outotec, they were regular sponsors of many MEI Conferences under the names of their individual companies. The merger was completed in July last year, forming a unique new company with leadership in sustainable minerals and metals processing and recycling technologies.  It was great to have representatives present three papers today.

Guillermo Bermudez, of Metso Outotec Canada, presented strategies to optimise and modernise existing flotation circuits; Danish Bilal, of Metso Outotec Finland discussed the effect of ore blending on flotation and prediction of metallurgical performance of blended feed in flotation by simulation; and Janne Suhonen, also from Finland showed how locked cycle test results can be predicted from kinetic flotation test data.

Canada's Woodgrove Technologies sponsored Flotation '19, but were unable to attend, so it was good to have a presentation from David Hatton, manager of flotation development at Woodgrove, who are sponsoring once again. Woodgrove’s Staged Flotation Reactors (SFR) and Direct Flotation Reactors (DFR) are low-footprint and cost-efficient flotation units that are claimed to achieve higher upgrading at similar recovery to conventional flotation cells. David described the application of a novel benchtop flotation reactor for greenfields scale-up and design of industrial SFR and DFR Circuits.

Complementing today's and tomorrow's presentations was a 2-hour live panel discussion on the future of flotation circuits and machines (posting of 9th August). Chaired by Dr. Peter Amelunxen, experienced practitioners from around the world shared their views, and took part in lively discussions initiated by conference delegates. 

It was a shame that Prof. Graeme Jameson was unable to join the panel, due to connectivity problems in Australia. I am sure he would have made a valuable contribution to the wide-ranging discussions.

It is difficult to summarise a 2-hour discussion in a few paragraphs, but it was clear that future flotation circuits are likely to be hybrids, a mix of conventional mechanical cells, which are still very effective in treating particles in the 25-200 micron range, and a new generation of alternative machines such as Hydrofloat and Novacell for coarse flotation and Concorde and Jameson cells for ultrafine recovery.

There have been many challenges over the last 40 years, feed grades now being lower than many old tailings grades, and developments have led to a remarkable increase in mechanical cell size, but it is felt that 600-700 m3 cells are probably the limiting size. 

Existing operations have been slow to adopt the new cell technologies, mainly due to the risk involved. Mechanical cells work, so there has not been a great deal of incentive to upgrade old circuits, and process control strategies have to be adapted to the new technologies.

But the innovative new cells are now being employed in new circuits, often supplementing mechanical machines for different duties. Even so many plants are having a hard time accepting equipment that they are not familiar with, and cannot be easily scaled up from laboratory test-work, as can traditional machines.

As the world strives for zero carbon emissions, effective flotation of a very wide range of particle size is of prime importance, whether this be achieved by 'universal' flotation machines or by a combination of the old and the new. It was felt that coarse particle flotation will increase in importance, as it can be regarded as an ore sorting preconcentration stage, reducing not only energy, but also water requirements.

The live panel discussion was recorded and is available on demand for the next 6 months, as are all the presentations this week, so it is not too late to register!

#Flotation21
@barrywills

4 comments:

  1. I am glad to be in Flotation'21 on-line which has gone very well. I also think it was a good panel with interesting questions and different point of views about the future of flotation machines and circuits. It was a pity that Graeme was not there.
    Juan Yianatos, Santa Maria University, Chile

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was great to have you on the panel, Juan. Many thanks

      Delete
  2. Hello Jon, and greetings to Chairman Peter,

    I’m sorry that I couldn’t join the panel discussion. All went well until you tried to transfer me, when an error message appeared and the connection was lost. This happened multiple times as you know. I tried moving from Firefox to Safari to no avail.

    I thought I should simply withdraw as a panelist. My main points would have been:

    The Future of Flotation Circuits and Machines

    The title is too limiting because it sees flotation as an entity in its own right, independent of the comminution circuit.

    Comminution and flotation should be seen as a single operation. The only purpose of commminution is to prepare the feed for flotation, but flotation cannot be optimised unless the comminution step has been carried out properly.

    I’m a strong supporter of fine and coarse particle flotation in the same vessel. When the ore has been properly characterised, a conversation should develop between the grinding and flotation circuits to provide the best possible result for the concentrator as a whole, taking into account the size-by-size recovery of particles in the flotation feed distribution..

    In a future concentrator, the coarse particle machine will be placed directly after the primary grinding mill. A high recovery will be achieved. The product grade will be poor, but that can be rectified by subsequent regrinding and cleaner flotation. The rougher tails will go straight to disposal.

    For example, suppose a free-milling copper ore with a head grade of 1% copper is ground in a SAG mill and subjected to coarse particle flotation. In principle, all the copper could be recovered with a mass pull of only 3 to 5% but in practice, one has to assume entrainment, so the operating mass pull will probably be 10 to 20% of the flotation feed. As a result 80% of the feed will go straight to final tailings, meaning that the load on the secondary mill will be reduced from 100% of flotation feed to 20% approximately. Massive savings in operating cost and capex.

    A design to achieve this goal can only be achieved if the size-by-size characteristics of the ore are matched to the product from the grinding circuit. Economically, it may not be possible to achieve the required particle size distribution in the mill product, which may require a top size of 400 µm for example. But this could be solved by taking a primary mill product at a top size of, for example, 1 mm, using a centrifuge to separate the particles in the band 400 µm to 1 mm, from the 0 to 400 µm particles that could go straight to coarse particle flotation. The centrifuge oversize, representing around 30% of the primary mill product, would be ground from 1 mm to 400 µm in a ball mill, and combined with the feed to coarse particle flotation.

    Remembering that the secondary ball mill load would already have been reduced by 80%, there should be plenty of savings available to cover the cost of the ball or rod mill necessary to re-grind the 400mm to 1mm particles referred to. A circuit of this type has been modelled and the savings in energy costs are of the order of 30 to 40% of the energy requirements of a mine.

    All this depends on the ability of a coarse particle machine to recover particles as large as 400 µm in a well-lberated feed. My new machine, the NovaCell would be an ideal candidate. It can easily recover particles such as chalcopyrite in the complete range from almost zero up to a top size that depends only on the liberation characteristics of the ore.

    This is the message I would have attempted to get across, if I had been able to connect with the Flotation ’21 panel presentation. However, I’m sure there would have been more than enough stimulating ideas discussed, without my contribution!

    We’ll meet again I’m sure. The virtual presentations were extremely well done. However, the social and networking opportunities that were such an enjoyable feature of the Cape Town meetings, will be missed.

    Best wishes to all the Wills,

    Kind regards
    Graeme Jameson, University of Newcastle, Australia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Graeme,

      I've reviewed your comments and couldn't agree more. I have also done similar calculations for our Mason Valley project in Nevada and came out with virtually identical energy savings estimates as your calculations (some water savings as well). I plan to evaluate this at our Copper World / Rosemont project in Arizona as well.

      Thanks again for the comments. I am truly excited about the future of our small mineral processing community and optimistic that Hudbay can be a leader in innovativate flotation circuit design, even if we aren't doing it on the moon!

      Thanks again,
      Pete
      Peter Amelunxen, Hudbay Minerals, Canada

      Delete

If you have difficulty posting a comment, please email the comment to bwills@min-eng.com and I will submit on your behalf