Spiral concentrators have, over numerous years, found many varied applications in mineral processing. Until relatively recently, all spirals were very similar, based upon the original Humphreys design, which is now obsolete. However, in recent years there have been considerable developments in spiral technology, and a wide range of devices is now available. The main areas of development have been in the introduction of spirals with only one concentrate take-off, at the bottom of the spiral, and the use of spirals without added wash water.
Spirals are now made with slopes of varying steepness, the angle affecting the specific gravity of separation, but having little effect on concentrate grade and recovery. Although a simple device, the separation mechanisms are complex, stratification being due to the combined effect of the differential settling rates of the particles, the effect of interstitial trickling through the flowing bed and the mild centrifugal force, often being likened to the stratification of particles in a river as it flows around a bend.
Southern and Northern Hemisphere Spirals |
It's seems logical as the water which evacuate from a sink. The vortex of water has a different sens in north or south hemisphere.
ReplyDeleteI am curious to watch the results, and how much it's efficient.
Olivier Notton, France
Thanks Olivier. This effect has also been observed on centrifugal gravity separators, and has been reported by the southern hemisphere-based Gekko Systems. See http://tinyurl.com/bs678yq
DeleteI had seen at Yunnan China some spirals that also rotated on its own axis, so this also would affect the northern and southern hemisphere,jorge
ReplyDeletejorge lema patino (Bolivia)
I note the date ---
ReplyDeleteBertil PĂ„lsson, Sweden
Can this be used prior to collectorless flotation?
ReplyDeleteI assume you are referring, Chris, to the previous reported work from the Bodmin Institute ? They are a very innovative team, aren’t they?
DeleteIncredibly. It must be something in the water. :)
Deletealso remember the Gekko article, and there was a simlar one done by Falcon - funnily enough the announcements were made on exactly the same day of the year.
ReplyDeleteThis then led me to review the work of the prodigious Bodmin Institute, especially thier work on collectorless flotation. I do have one conundrum though - if water has a "memory", and we humans are at least 70% water - why can't I remember what I did an hour ago, never mind last week? I put it down to the inhibiting effect of decent beer.
Nigel MacDonald, SGS Minerals Services, UK
Yes, and coincidentally the collectorless flotation research was announced on exactly the same day a year ago. You probably missed the essential 'succussion' stage, where forceful striking is necessary for the water to retain its memory. May I therefore suggest a tap on the head?
DeleteSo are equitorial spirals and concentrators bi-directional?
ReplyDeleteSusan(Sue)Ritz (SGS/KD Engineering, USA)
I put your question, Sue, to Dr. Hayles, and he suggested that spirals at the equator might perform better if laid on their sides.
Delete1. Kindly let us know the particle size limitations-- for 10 micron & upper limit mm.
ReplyDelete2. At what difference in solid specific gravity it works---between product and tailing.
3. With which equipment we can compare its efficiency or any specific mineral is good for spiral.
4. Yes Humpry spirals started with sand washing. But today many more minerals are beign beneficiated. New designs like double start, more angle of trough, more dia of trough, width of trough also increased.
5. Spirals come under green technology. Zero power required. The only drw back ----you need hundreds of spirals to compensate huge capacity, and its control, cleaning, maintenence, supervison-- etc.
Kshirasagara sivarao (India)
Further information on the Bodmin Institute can be found at http://tinyurl.com/d3r23zl
ReplyDeleteThe liquors alledgedly also flow upwards counter current fashion, when installed downunder. (Relative to the direction of gravity in the northern hemisphere no doubt.)
ReplyDeletePatrick Jay, FLSmidth, Australia
Yes that can be a problem. Have you tried operating the spiral upside down?
Delete1. A compas magnet needle responds to earth magnetism, then why particles will not respond. Particles are supposed to respond similar to needle direction at any place in the world. We need to confirm if this behaviour is for particles having strong magnetic properties. Will non-magnetic particles also behave in similar way, need to be confirmed.
ReplyDelete2. It is a good invention but , are results commercially viable, similar to flotation cells. For iron ores can spiral give 1-2% SiO2, similar to column flotation. If it is true then we can trust the above stements are correct.
Kshirasagara sivarao (India)
I mentioned that I had seen spirals that rotates on their on axis. Also we had al the lab. here in Bolivia a spirals that moves up and down creating an additional jigging effect. This has shown for gold a better performance increasing 1% grade and 1% recovery. and has nothing to do with the rotation of the earth or the beer. Any way according to our experience the australian spirals are the best for fine tailings, for tn, and iron as we tested
ReplyDeletejorge lema patino, Bolivia
There appears to be a bit of subtle humor in todays MEI.
ReplyDeleteFirst, Barry's reference to the BODMIN Institute ( http://tinyurl.com/d3r23zl - a mental hospital),
then the statement in the brochure by GEKKO on SPIRALS - " In a parallel stream of research, the application of massive electrical currents during the initial stages of polymerisation is being investigated. However, access to this laboratory was temporarily suspended after the lead scientist, Professor Steven McKing, had a nervous breakdown and was isolated in the medical wing muttering over and over again “it creeps, and leaps, and glides and slides.”
I am still laughing - what a great sense of humor!!!
Louis Bernard, Snowden Consultants, Canada
Glad you liked it Louis. Just a little light relief amongst all the serious discussions. You may also like last year's April 1st posting, which also fooled a few
Delete