Monday, 24 June 2013

Physical Separation ‘13 - conference diary

Physical Separation ‘13 was held at the St. Michael’s Hotel, Falmouth, UK, from June 20-21, 2013 and was sponsored by FLSmidth, TOMRA Sorting Solutions, Limn The Flowsheet Processor, International Mining, Industrial Minerals and AT International. 


As always, this is my diary of events, which I hope will be supplemented by comments from delegates.

Thursday June 20th
I opened the conference this morning and welcomed our 58 delegates, representing 15 countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, UK and USA. Thirteen of the delegates from Computational Modelling ‘13 had stayed on for this conference, including 6 from the University of New South Wales.

Before the start of the technical sessions I had the great pleasure of presenting Randall Zahn, of FLSmidth, USA with the MEI Young Persons Award for 2012 (see MEI Online for the citation).

MEI Conferences

David Wiseman and MEI's Amanda
Conference sponsor David Wiseman of Limn: The Flowsheet Processor, Australia, presented the first paper in the technical sessions, showing how physical separation processes can often be modelled and simulated to a useful degree of accuracy using relatively simple techniques. By selection of appropriate component species sets and limiting model complexity to the simplest required to answer the problem posed, many of the pitfalls normally associated with mathematical modelling and simulation can be avoided.The mining and processing industry relies on macro scale avoidance of waste at the front end of the operation, followed by the progressive removal of waste and contaminants via comminution and separation.  Unfortunately the low grade of valuable content in most metalliferous operations, dictates that vast quantities of associated host rock and gangue accompanies the valuable material to the processing plant.

David Bowman, of Bear Rock Solutions, Australia described how, in association with Newcrest Mining Ltd, a robust scientific plan has been devised which examines the fundamental nature of waste rejection, the possibilities for exploitation and how it could be employed across their various operating sites and in future operations.  The total project examines a range of waste rejection techniques capable of deployment at coarser size ranges and these include systems based on, size, gravity, physical and chemical properties.  The results of this study show that some process streams offer significant potential for waste rejection, but in most cases there is no “one pass” waste rejection option. Rather the rejection process becomes a series of liberate-separate cycles. At each stage the altered physical characteristics of the material open different possibilities for rejection techniques.

Suresh Srinivasan of the Indian Institute of Technology reviewed the recent developments in microwave applications in metallurgical processes including mineral processing, microwave assisted grinding, microwave enhanced magnetic separation, microwave treatment of coal, and also in the field of extractive metallurgy such as roasting and calcination, leaching, and reduction. This was followed by a presentation from the University of Queensland on the FDTD simulation of microwave heating of a variable feed inside two microwave applicators, with different uniformity parameters.




There was an interesting array of papers after the morning coffee break. Martin Brandaeur of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,
Germany, presented a paper on the physical separation of secondary waste from the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and Vladimir Rizmanoski of the University of Queensland showed how micro-cone beam tomography offers a non-destructive way of identifying coarse and fine mineral grain dissemination on a particle by particle basis. There is substantial potential benefit for separate treatment if a practical means of coarse separation based on texture existed.
MEI Conferences
Martin Brandaeur and John Clout prepare for their presentations
John Clout of Australia discussed recent advances in iron ore beneficiation, particularly for low grade hematite-goethite ores containing clay and quartz gangue, which have proved difficult to upgrade and capital intensive to process when using existing beneficiation technology. A number of wet plants have recently been constructed in the Pilbara region of Western Australia using a new flowsheet, consisting of wet screens, hydrocyclones, upcurrent classifiers, spirals and dewatering screens. The process overcomes many of the disadvantages of more traditional iron ore processing flowsheets.

The average grades of many mineral ores are in long term decline while the demand for minerals and metals continues to increase. The overall effect is to increase the consumption of energy per tonne of metal produced. For many ores, most energy is consumed in communition, and for many low grade ores much of the communition energy is expended on barren rock.

One way to moderate this dilemma is to sort ore at coarse sizes to reject very low grade or barren gangue. Rejecting waste at coarse sizes reduces the energy required for communition and per unit of metal produced. Such dry ore beneficiation is an objective in many mines nowadays. Water withdrawal and disposal and all related environmental aspects became key issues, even more in arid areas. Sensor based sorting technology using X-Ray-Transmission (XRT) has proven its ability in recent years in industrial scale applications. High efficiencies and recovery rates can be achieved using the latest technologies. Powerful computers and increasingly sensitive X-ray scintillation counters have allowed the development of high-performance units. The machines have reached a status of rigid and reliable field stability and can be operated at grain sizes of 8 mm up to 70 mm, depending on the individual ore.

MEI Conferences
Jens-Michael Bergmann with
Industrial Minerals' Laura Syrett
Jens-Michael Bergmann, of conference sponsor TOMRA Sorting, Germany, described the basics of XRT-sorting technology followed by a case study of a chromite processing plant in South Africa where a state-of-the-art XRT sorting machine is operating together with spiral concentrators. The sorter is pre-concentrating the ROM chromite ore by removing barren waste and low grade rocks, while after comminution the spirals are concentrating the ore to a market grade of above 46% Cr2O3.
Rob Morrison of the University of Queensland described how to measure the potential of ore for sorting and the development of a range of indices which can be used to describe their intrinsic sortability and their actual sortability for any sorting process. He also showed how many mineral deposits do not have sharp, well defined boundaries. They grade away to very low grades through a non-economic halo which may contain as much metal as the economic part of the deposit. If some of the halo ore can be upgraded by sorting, the size of the deposit is increased. If marginal ore can be upgraded, the effective capacity of the concentrator can be increased “making space” for the upgraded ore from the low grade halo. These opportunities do not fit into the conventional cut off grade model for ore selection, and the paper considered alternative strategies for the definition of “ore” which may also lead to enhanced value of the deposit with a lowered requirement of environmental remediation.

Three papers on hydrocyclones started the afternoon session. Johann Dueck of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat, Germany, described an approximate analytical method for calculating and explaining the non-monotonic partition curve (fish-hook effect) of a hydrocyclone.

Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT) was developed at Birmingham University in the late 1980s, and has proven to be a powerful visualization tool for industrial engineering applications. Many attempts have been made to capture the key relationships between hydrocyclone operating and geometrical variables in models, but hydrocyclone characterization is still heavily empirical and on a case-by-case basis. Jen Radman, of McGill University, Canada showed how hydrocyclone flow patterns can be quantified under realistic industrial conditions using PEPT.

Maryam Ghodrat, of the University of NSW, Australia, showed that hydrocyclones usually follow conventional cone design and may have some limitations on separation performances. A continuum-based multiphase flow model showed that cyclone performance is sensitive to cone section length as well as cone shape. Robert Johansson, of Chalmers University, Sweden, then showed how modelling was being used by Chalmers University, Sweden, to predict the performance of a two-step air classifier, using data from a Swedish crushing plant.

MEI Conferences
Chris Rehmann with Suresh Srinivasan
Modern mining processes require the use of large quantities of water, yet clean water is a finite and ever-scarcer resource. Chris Rehmann of AESSEAL Inc., USA described, in the final paper of the day, a proven sealing technology which enhances physical separation and filtration processes, and improves filter-press cycle times. This is accomplished by replacing traditional flushed gland packing on pumps with a double mechanical seal that recirculates clean water from a novel seal support system which has no moving parts. It was claimed that improvements in pump and filtration systems using this system are now saving over 25 billion gallons of water worldwide each year.

Talking of water, the weather has been atrocious today, but despite the conditions, around 20 hardy souls braved the elements for the evening coastal path walk. The 17th century Chain Locker pub provided a warm and dry destination, and good Cornish ale in the company of the Cornish Mining Sundowner whose monthly meeting happily coincided with the walk.







MEI Conferences
Drying out at the Chain Locker





Friday June 21st
This morning’s papers were an eclectic mix, starting with a presentation from Daniel Amariei of COREM, Canada on the reflux classifier, one of COREM’s research projects dealing with the introduction of new potential technologies for the recovery of fine particles. The reflux classifier is mainly used in the coal and minerals industries, but the paper summarised the experimental work undertaken for the assessment of concentration capacity of the reflux classifier for iron fines beneficiation, where the recovery of fines has become a high priority.

Jian Cheng, of the University of New South Wales showed how Computational Fluid Dynamics and DEM modelling can optimise the design and operation of dense medium cyclones in coal preparation, and then Darryel Boucher, of McGill University, showed how PEPT is a powerful method to visualise the behaviour of particles during the concentration process, providing data that will be used for the validation of new models of spiral concentrator performance.

Gravity concentration modelling was also the subject of a paper by Jean-Sebastien Kroll-Rabotin, of the University of Alberta, who described the validation of a predictive model for industrial scale Falcon concentrators, enhanced gravity devices which are commonly used in the mining industry.

Eduardo Crespo, of Daytal Resources, Spain described the development of a new DEM mathematical model for the description of segregation and dispersion in jigging beds, which also gives important insights into the jigging mechanism. Agnieszka Surowiak of AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland then provided a comparative assessment of separation efficiency in jigging.

Rare earth elements are becoming increasingly important for a variety of uses (see posting of 1st February). Rare earth (RE) mineral deposits are typically processed using several different unit operations including gravity, magnetic, electrostatic and flotation separation. Two of the most important beneficiation techniques for RE minerals are gravity and magnetic separation. Many RE minerals are found alongside low specific gravity gangue minerals thereby permitting the use of gravity separations to concentrate the heavy value RE minerals. Magnetic separation is used primarily to remove ferromagnetic gangue minerals as well as to separate individual paramagnetic rare earth minerals. Adam Jordens, of McGill University, described how a series of magnetic separators (wet variable intensity, wet drum permanent magnet, Frantz Isodynamic Separator) in conjunction with gravity pre-concentration steps (Knelson and Falcon centrifugal concentrators) have been used to beneficiate a rare earth ore.

The internal workings of wet Low Intensity Magnetic Separators are poorly understood, and Jan Stener, of Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, showed how ultrasonic velocity profiling could be used to enhance our understanding.

Rob Morrison of the University of Queensland presented work on the investigation of the radiofrequency properties of conductive minerals. Unlike insulating minerals, such as quartz or feldspar, the propensity of conductive minerals to heat using radiofrequency energy has not been particularly well quantified or documented. A detailed knowledge of the RF properties of all minerals is required if RF energy is to be effectively used in many potential applications.

MEI Conferences
Dave Wiseman with Rob Morrison and Hugh Rice
The final paper of the morning session was presented by Hugh Rice, of Leeds University, who discussed the application of the ultrasonic dual-frequency method, which uses the backscattered signal received by transducers operating in the megahertz range, to determine the concentration profile in suspensions of solid particles in a carrier fluid. The observed trends demonstrate that this technique has great potential for measuring the settling and separation behaviour of real suspensions and slurries in a range of applications, such as the nuclear and minerals processing industries.




Dewatering was the theme of the final session of the conference. Understanding settling and thickening of complex, concentrated sludges and suspensions is a critical requirement in numerous industries. Jaiyana Bux of Leeds University showed how an acoustic backscatter system has demonstrated potential for in situ characterisation with minimal intrusion. A gravity thickener containing a water treatment waste stream was successfully profiled, by correlating the backscatter attenuation in situ with that of homogenous suspensions. Fernando Betancourt, of Universidad de Concepcion, Chile, then described a model to control continuous sedimentation of suspensions in clarifier-thickener units.

In the final presentation, Chris Pickles, of Queen’s University, Canada, showed how microwaves could be used as an alternative energy source for drying a sub-bituminous coal. The results demonstrated that microwave drying had several advantages over conventional drying, such as reduced drying time and increased drying efficiency.

Amanda closed the conference and invited all delegates to Physical Separation ‘15 in two years time.  There were 35 papers presented at the conference, including 7 as posters. These are all available on CD from MEI. Final papers will be peer-reviewed and published in a special Physical Separation issue of Minerals Engineering.

 During the final coffee break I gave a short introduction to the geology of Cornwall, and its copper and tin mineralisation, prior to our late afternoon visit to the Camborne-Redruth mining area, the “birthplace of modern mining”.

During my 22 years at Camborne School of Mines (CSM), I must have made the journey to Camborne and back many thousands of times, but it is always fascinating to see the gradual change in the landscape, from Falmouth's lush greenery to the relatively bleak mining landscape around the famous mining towns of Redruth and Camborne. Our coach passed the South Crofty mine, which closed in 1998, and the site of Dolcoath, which in the late 19th century was the world's greatest and deepest mine. Then on to the village of Troon in the heart of what was once the world's largest producer of copper and tin.

We were privileged to have an exclusive tour of the award winning King Edward Mine (KEM) Museum, once owned by CSM, and where I had my first office! The mill at KEM simulates the flowsheet of an early 20th century tin dressing plant, with now obsolete devices such as Frue vanners, hand jigs, round frames, buddles and rag frames. The Californian stamps were also run for a short period, to give us an impression of the cacophony of sound which must have assaulted the ears in those far-off days when hundreds of mines were operating in this area. On behalf of the group I must thank Tony Clarke, who I worked with all those years at CSM, Frank Kneebone and conference delegate Nigel MacDonald for hosting us, and for their deep knowledge of, and enthusiasm for, Cornish mining.

King Edward Mine MEI Conferences
Shaking Table


King Edward Mine MEI Conferences
Rag Frames


King Edward Mine MEI Conferences
Tony Clarke explains the hand jig

From KEM we drove to the small mining village of Carnkie to explore the ruins of the dressing floors of the Basset Mines, a now peaceful area of what was once a hellish district of danger, smoke-bellowing engine houses, and the ever present ear-splitting pounding of the stamp batteries.
Basset Mines MEI Conferences
Overlooking Marriott's Shaft, Wheal South Frances

Basset Mines MEI Conferences
Wheal Basset


Basset Mines MEI Conferences
West Basset

Basset Mines MEI Conferences
West Basset with the stamps engine house in the background
Then a leisurely drive back to Falmouth to say our goodbyes after what has been a great week of conferences, with whom Laura Syrett, of sponsor Industrial Minerals, described on Twitter (#PhysicalSeparation13) as mineral processing's elite!

11 comments:

  1. Sounds like a great conference, can't wait to see the papers.

    Congrats to Randy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Peter. Two very worthy winners of the MEI Award! Hard acts to follow.

      Delete
  2. Hi everybody,
    From what I gather, the Conference delegates who visited King Edward Mine Museum on the Friday evening all enjoyed the trip, and we all enjoyed having you.
    Just for information, the working 5-head set of 'Californian' (or 'revolving') stamps here were manufactured by Fraser & Chalmers of Erith, Kent (just southeast of London) and came to the mine after being exhibited at the great Paris Exposition of 1900. Each head weighs 850 lbs. and, working at about 70 drops per minute, would have had a throughput of up to one and a quarter tons per 24 hours.
    Not too far away, the famous old Dolcoath tin mine had 60 heads of this type, and South Crofty's new mill, early in the 20th century, had 40 heads, which were only eventually replaced in 1959.
    Just across the road from KEM, the Wheal Grenville tin mine had two large batteries of the old-style Cornish stamps - 'Old Stamps' with 112 heads, and 'New Stamps' with over 100 more - so that the inhabitants of the nearby village of Troon got thoroughly used to the sound.
    We all hope that you will visit the King Edward Mine website from time to time, just to see what we have been doing and how the museum is progressing.
    Best wishes to all,
    The King Edward Mine Team.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this Tony. No matter how many times I visit KEM I find it fascinating. And always good to see my old office, the broom cupboard in the survey office. Best wishes to you all- keep up the great work!

      Delete
  3. Thank you for organizing such a wonderful conference. Attending the sessions were useful.Could learn about the current trends in minerals processing. Also enjoyed the walk in the evenings and the trip to Camborne mines. Hope that I get the opportunity to attend the conference in 2015.

    Thanks
    Dr. Arpita Ghosh, National Metallurgical Laboratory, India

    ReplyDelete
  4. Many thanks to the MEI team for organising this conference on the topic of physical separation. This is for sure traditional mineral processing, but definitely not out of date as shown by all the interesting papers on new measurement technologies. I also enjoyed the Friday afternoon trip to the King Edward Mine and that we were treated to a live demonstration of its technology.

    Bertil Pålsson

    ReplyDelete
  5. It was an amazing experience that I had a very good interaction with almost all the international delegates of Physical Separation'13. The conference venue was lovely, it was wonderful to stay at Falmouth, I stayed a couple of days more after the conference and explored in and around the town.

    The trip to Camborne-Redruth mining area was awesome and I found the joy at the faces of you, Nigel MacDonald & Co for bringing back the memories that you've worked for the mining to all the delegates, and it was really a different experience (a long walk)!!.
    My special thanks to Mr. Jon for the timely pick-up at docks station and also took responsibilities for checking every delegates before/after leaving the places during the trip!!.
    Finally, I just want to thank and congrats you and the MEI team for all their efforts came to a great success and remains memorable!!!.
    with regards
    Suresh S, IIT Bombay,Mumbai, India

    ReplyDelete
  6. It was a very interesting conference! Meeting people working in the same field (iron ore processing) but with different landmarks concerning the iron ore beneficiation in terms of processes and flowsheets was very interesting for me. Linking physical separation conference with a applied mineralogy session would be probably very interesting, since the latter is essential for physical separation.
    I very much enjoyed the walk around Falmouth in the rain! I’ll never forget it…Also the trip to Camborne-Redruth mining area was excellent. The demonstration at the King Edward Mine was awesome!
    I’ve noticed the excellent organization: the location of the hotel and the view from its restaurant were awesome. Moreover, Amanda and Jon were very helpful with their tips concerning the city and the transfer from the rail station to the hotel.
    …and I had the chance to meet Mr. Barry Wills….

    Daniel Amariei from COREM, Québec, QC, Canada

    ReplyDelete
  7. Photos from the conference can be viewed on the MEI Online site and also on our Facebook site - please feel free to tag them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have attended a number of MEI conferences in the past. This was one of the best. Very high quality presentations with good discussion. The chairpersons were particularly good at promoting discussion. It looks like sorting has the potential to become a major step in the beneficiation process. The walks and tours were great. Enjoyed interacting with the delegates.
    Chris
    Chris Pickles,Robert M Buchan Department of Mining,Queen’s University, Canada

    ReplyDelete
  9. See also the report by Laura Syrett in Industrial Minerals, July 2013, pps. 12-13

    ReplyDelete

If you have difficulty posting a comment, please email the comment, and any photos that you might like to add, to bwills@min-eng.com and I will submit on your behalf